| daniel added a comment. |
@Tgr Sounds like a decent plan. In an ideal world, the "short description" functionality would be factored out of wikidata, so it could be backed by *just* the magic word or *just* wikidata or both combined or something else. But that would of course break B/C. So I suppose modifying PageTerms is an OK solution. I agree that making TermSqlIndex aware of the override wouldn't be a good choice.
Instead of making the "original" description available in addition (which one is "original" anyway?) or indicating whether the description returned was overwritten, perhaps add a parameter for suppressing the override, forcing the use of the description from wikidata: disable-description-override or force-shared-description or something.
Cc: Mholloway, Tbayer, MZMcBride, Alsee, bearND, Mike_Peel, Tgr, JKatzWMF, daniel, Bmueller, Addshore, Lydia_Pintscher, Samwilson, Aklapper, DannyH, Lahi, Gq86, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, LawExplorer, JJMC89, B20180, Nakon, MusikAnimal, Niharika, Fhocutt, Wikidata-bugs, aude, Ricordisamoa, -jem-, Mbch331, Krenair
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
