| doctaxon added a comment. |
@Smalyshev wrote:
This will always be the case, we will never be able to serve arbitrary requests that require unlimited time to perform.
@Smalyshev: ... but you didn't explain the reason why not. We really don't need requests of unlimited time, but simply any requests that can be put to a longer timeout duration. Not unlimited, but longer limit. @Magnus has made a good suggestion. Why do we not discuss about it with the target, to get a good result to provide any bigger requests. Wikidata is growing more and more, if we stand still, then SPARQL will be useless in near future. I hereby invite @MichaelSchoenitzer_WMDE to participate on this discussion, because he has a lot of knowledge about SPARQL.
Please let's discuss about Magnus' suggestion stated above, because I think, that it is a really good solution.
Thank you very much, Martin
Cc: chasemp, Lydia_Pintscher, Magnus, MichaelSchoenitzer_WMDE, MisterSynergy, doctaxon, Jonas, matej_suchanek, Ash_Crow, Daniel_Mietchen, Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE, Jane023, Base, Gehel, Smalyshev, Ijon, Aklapper, Lahi, Gq86, Darkminds3113, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, EBjune, merbst, LawExplorer, Avner, FloNight, Xmlizer, jkroll, Wikidata-bugs, Jdouglas, aude, Tobias1984, Manybubbles, Mbch331
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
