| daniel added a comment. |
@Tgr wrote
Or just allow multiple sitelinks and treat them like constraint violations.
Yes, but currently, we have a unique key on that, and the table isn't small. A schema change is an option, sure.
But we'll have that discussion if it's clear that we actually want to do this... do you agree that prepareSave() should conceptually be bound to edits, not revision creation?
TASK DETAIL
EMAIL PREFERENCES
To: daniel
Cc: Aklapper, hoo, Anomie, Tgr, Lydia_Pintscher, daniel, Lahi, Gq86, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, LawExplorer, Agabi10, Wikidata-bugs, aude, Mbch331
Cc: Aklapper, hoo, Anomie, Tgr, Lydia_Pintscher, daniel, Lahi, Gq86, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, LawExplorer, Agabi10, Wikidata-bugs, aude, Mbch331
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
