| thiemowmde added a comment. |
From all I know about quantity values and uncertainty bounds (a.k.a. "precision") I would say that "7251" is still a valid integer, even if it is followed by "±0.3".
My main argument is: Would you consider "5±1" an integer? I think you would, right? If you do, then it would not make sense to consider a value like "5±0.999" that is a little bit more precise to not be an integer any more.
Or the other way around: It would be plausible to say "5±0.999" is not an integer. But if you do this, "5±1" can not be an integer too.
For practical purposes I would introduce a separate "precise" constraint that disallows uncertainty bounds, if something like this is needed. I would implement the integer constraint in a way that is independent from that and ignores uncertainty bounds entirely.
Cc: gerritbot, MisterSynergy, Esc3300, thiemowmde, daniel, Jonas, Lydia_Pintscher, Aklapper, Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE, Versusxo, Majesticalreaper22, Giuliamocci, Adrian1985, Cpaulf30, Lahi, Gq86, Baloch007, Darkminds3113, Bsandipan, Lordiis, GoranSMilovanovic, lisong, Adik2382, Soteriaspace, Jayprakash12345, Th3d3v1ls, JakeTheDeveloper, Ramalepe, Liugev6, QZanden, LawExplorer, Lewizho99, Maathavan, Agabi10, Wikidata-bugs, aude, TheDJ, Mbch331
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
