| Psychoslave added a comment. |
In T193728#4212631, @Denny wrote:@Rspeer
But even ignoring that, Wikidata does *not* store the same _expression_ anyway. So what exactly is the copyright asserted on?
For now I propose we discuss the "original selection" criteria.
Even sticking with the single example of London, the French Wikipedia do have an article with this specific title, whose English interlang link to "London (disambiguation)", and not to "London". So even with such a basic example, there are clearly choices that were made.
Thus said, the "original selection" pertains to the whole set, rather than hand picked little selections. Actually I'v just been told that the important number of contributors would plead all the more in favour of the originality (which must not be confused with novelty).
Cc: ArthurPSmith, SimonPoole, Scott_WorldUnivAndSch, Micru, lisong, Lofhi, Nemo_bis, TomT0m, jrbs, EgonWillighagen, sarojdhakal, Agabi10, NMaia, Simon_Villeneuve, Jarekt, Rspeer, OhKayeSierra, Aschmidt, AndrewSu, Mateusz_Konieczny, Maxlath, Huji, Glrx, Realworldobject, Ltrlg, Papapep, Tgr, Ayack, Gnom1, MichaelMaggs, MisterSynergy, Pasleim, Cirdan, 0x010C, Sylvain_WMFr, Denny, Ivanhercaz, Pintoch, Lydia_Pintscher, Lea_Lacroix_WMDE, Aklapper, Psychoslave, Lahi, Gq86, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, LawExplorer, ZhouZ, Mpaulson, Wikidata-bugs, aude, jayvdb, Slaporte, Mbch331, Jay8g
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
