| VIGNERON added a comment. |
As explained in my prevuious message, I agree we need to specify at least language and script. For the rest (country, orthography reform, ...), I think the best way to store this kind of information is to use property in the lexeme itself. The advantages of the property is it is really flexible and so we can decide a psoteriori what kind of information we want to store in one lexeme.
Indeed, property is a good idea but how would you deal with Alptraum / Albtraum?
And why not doing both, the current tagging and properties? (same for Lexical Category and Grammatical features, the need for both as already been discussed)
Let us take the example of the "de-CH-1996" code, am I supposed to use this code only for word in Swiss German followinf the 1996 reform?
Obviously yes
If the same lexeme is used both in Swiss German and in "standard German", should I use this code.
Obviously not.
If a Swiss German lexeme has not been modified by the 1996 reform, should I use "de-CH-1996", "de-CH" or both.
de-CH (or another more precise tag), both is impossible as a lemma can only have one language (if there is two lang, it's not one lemma, it's two lemmata).
All are valid and I think it will be really difficult to managed.
Yes all codes are valid but they don't mean the same thing.
Where is the difficulty here? More exactly: how is it less difficult than properties? (see all the wars on some WD items, on Wiktionaries or among the scholars, no reason that this will be magically solved on Wikidata, either by the codes or by properties)
Cc: Pamputt, Liuxinyu970226, Micru, VIGNERON, Lydia_Pintscher, Lea_Lacroix_WMDE, Aklapper, Lahi, Gq86, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, LawExplorer, Wikidata-bugs, aude, Darkdadaah, Mbch331
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
