| Krinkle added a comment. |
@Jdlrobson Yes, there is some form of sandboxing at the level of module loading. Which means that if you define module "a" and "b" as a.js and b.js, and load them separately but in the same request with "a" before "b", then even if "a" throws an exception during initialisation (e.g. syntax error or some other error that happens when first executing the file), then "b" should still run without issue.
Can you still reproduce a problem locally when RelatedArticles is without the above patch? If so, could you try to make a more minimal test case that ends up with e.g. putting a certain piece of code in module X that makes it fail and something in module Y, where Y won't get executed?
TASK DETAIL
EMAIL PREFERENCES
To: Jdlrobson, Krinkle
Cc: Krinkle, gerritbot, JGirault, Massimo_Telo, Nicholas.tsg, Jdlrobson, ovasileva, Andyrom75, Aklapper, Winter, Wikidata-bugs, Lydia_Pintscher
Cc: Krinkle, gerritbot, JGirault, Massimo_Telo, Nicholas.tsg, Jdlrobson, ovasileva, Andyrom75, Aklapper, Winter, Wikidata-bugs, Lydia_Pintscher
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
