| Niedzielski added a comment. |
The WIP now records description and @type fields. The former is not required but seems to be recommended for the microdata format we were exploring previously. The latter is flagged as an error by Google's structured data testing tool when omitted.
I am currently using instance of and subclass of for @type which is also not understood by Google's structured data testing tool. I don't know if this is the correct vocabulary for the near term. Dan Brickley didn't seem to think it was an issue in this StackOverflow response to use unrecognized strings but I'm just guessing.
@Tbayer has connected me with access to desktop and mobile en/eswiki Google search console access.
I've made a general request for help in the #wikidata IRC channel. @ovasileva, if there's a contact I should work with on this task in Wikidata that would be immensely helpful to ensuring it's done properly and as quickly as possible.
I'm somewhat blocked on T206567 and T206570. I haven't started writing unit tests but being unable to link items impedes development.
Cc: Mholloway, gerritbot, Denny, ovasileva, Tbayer, Elitre, CKoerner_WMF, Jdlrobson, Niedzielski, phuedx, dr0ptp4kt, Imarlier, cscott, Krenair, Aklapper, Deskana, CucyNoiD, Nandana, NebulousIris, Gaboe420, Versusxo, Majesticalreaper22, Giuliamocci, Adrian1985, Cpaulf30, Lahi, Gq86, Baloch007, Darkminds3113, Bsandipan, Lordiis, GoranSMilovanovic, Adik2382, Chicocvenancio, Th3d3v1ls, Ramalepe, Liugev6, QZanden, LawExplorer, Winter, Lewizho99, Maathavan, Wikidata-bugs, aude, Mbch331
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
