daniel added a comment.

I don't have objections. Any clients that have ontology uris hard-coded will break, there is no way to avoid this.

We could provide same-as triples that map the old to the new uris. That would be nice, and in *theory* that means we stay backwards compatible. But very few RDF consumers do oven the most basic types of inference, so I don't think it will hep much in practice.

Still, it would be good to have that for completeness.


TASK DETAIL
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T112127

EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/

To: daniel
Cc: Addshore, Lydia_Pintscher, Tpt, Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE, hoo, Ricordisamoa, mkroetzsch, gerritbot, daniel, Aklapper, Smalyshev, CucyNoiD, Nandana, NebulousIris, Gaboe420, Versusxo, Majesticalreaper22, Giuliamocci, Adrian1985, Cpaulf30, Lahi, Gq86, Baloch007, Darkminds3113, Bsandipan, Lordiis, GoranSMilovanovic, Adik2382, Th3d3v1ls, Ramalepe, Liugev6, QZanden, EBjune, merbst, LawExplorer, Avner, Lewizho99, Maathavan, Gehel, Jonas, FloNight, Xmlizer, jkroll, Wikidata-bugs, Jdouglas, aude, Tobias1984, Manybubbles, Mbch331
_______________________________________________
Wikidata-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs

Reply via email to