| Jan_Dittrich added a comment. |
2.1 Q2.x are like 1.x, but only for september 2018.
Yes. Initially, you asked for an overview of the last 30 days or so. However, the wmf.mediawiki_history Hadoop table, where the data for this analysis is found, …
That’s fine, I only wanted to be sure to check if edit patterns did dramatically change in the last years, the actual month and how many days exactly… is thus not that crucial as long as it is recent-is any long enough to smooth possible extremes, so all is fine.
Q3…
As you have already observed it did cause a bit of a headache to me too. Please allow me some time to figure out the most informative approach to this visualization and as soon as I have it you will have it too. Thank you.
Great.
The axes are off: x represents Month-Year, y represents log(number of Revisions). I will correct this as soon as I am done with the tricky Q3 diagrams.
Thanks! I think it is useful, but I get the scaling issues… could you use a 10-based (instead of e-based) log scale for this one? I think it would be easier to understand, and we could label the axis 1-10-100… (so the "actual" counts).
Last but not least and for some context:
I would like to create a little poster based on these, so I try to make it graspable for "everyone". I think we are on a good way there. I think this explains, why I would go with natural frequencies and labels as often as possible; same with using a linear scaling if possible and if not a 10 instead of e-based one.
Cc: Lydia_Pintscher, GoranSMilovanovic, WMDE-leszek, Aklapper, Jan_Dittrich, Nandana, Lahi, Gq86, QZanden, LawExplorer, Jonas, Wikidata-bugs, aude, Mbch331
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
