| Marostegui added a comment. |
In T85414#4661580, @WMDE-leszek wrote:wb_terms_entity_id only uses the "old", numeric-only term_entity_id column, hence it probably has been kind of replaced by term_full_entity index.
As mentioned above by @Marostegui it dos not seem used, so I would guess it would be fine to just drop it from production.
But sure, let's re-add to the git repo, and have it removed once we've dropped from the production DBs. This seems a sane way of proceeding to me.
I am not sure if it is worth the time and specially the risk, if wb_terms is going to disappear at some point
TASK DETAIL
EMAIL PREFERENCES
To: Marostegui
Cc: WMDE-leszek, Marostegui, Addshore, hoo, Ladsgroup, JanZerebecki, aude, Aklapper, daniel, Nandana, Banyek, AndyTan, Lahi, Gq86, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, LawExplorer, Minhnv-2809, Luke081515, Wikidata-bugs, Mbch331, Jay8g, Krenair
Cc: WMDE-leszek, Marostegui, Addshore, hoo, Ladsgroup, JanZerebecki, aude, Aklapper, daniel, Nandana, Banyek, AndyTan, Lahi, Gq86, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, LawExplorer, Minhnv-2809, Luke081515, Wikidata-bugs, Mbch331, Jay8g, Krenair
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
