daniel added a comment.

The non-nodejs fallback (even with limitations) addresses my concerns. I still wouldn't want this to become one of a kind, but rather have this architecture to be an example solution that also others can and will use.

I agree that we shouldn't end up with a zoo of different front-end solutions. I wouldn't want to commit to this being the future, but I think it's a useful test case for one approach we might try out (namely, isomorphic JS for rendering).


TASK DETAIL
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T213318

EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/

To: daniel
Cc: Nikerabbit, jijiki, CDanis, ArielGlenn, Milimetric, akosiaris, Joe, mobrovac, Krinkle, daniel, Lydia_Pintscher, Lea_WMDE, Addshore, Matthias_Geisler_WMDE, Jakob_WMDE, Pablo-WMDE, WMDE-leszek, Aklapper, Nandana, kostajh, Lahi, Gq86, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, LawExplorer, _jensen, D3r1ck01, SBisson, Wikidata-bugs, aude, GWicke, jayvdb, fbstj, santhosh, Jdforrester-WMF, Mbch331, Rxy, Jay8g, Ltrlg, bd808, Legoktm
_______________________________________________
Wikidata-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs

Reply via email to