| ArthurPSmith added a comment. |
promise it will always be one-to-one, no matter what happens with internal IDs
Hmm - if it's NOT one-to-one, will that not break RDF? That is, if it's possible for 2 different statements to have the same ID, then you would have conflicting triples associated with the same URI. That's not good at all!
So I think a one-to-one mapping to the RDF format is important if we at all consider RDF support to be a fundamental piece of what wikidata provides...
TASK DETAIL
EMAIL PREFERENCES
To: ArthurPSmith
Cc: Smalyshev, Lydia_Pintscher, Liuxinyu970226, Aklapper, Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE, ArthurPSmith, Nandana, Lahi, Gq86, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, EBjune, merbst, LawExplorer, _jensen, Jonas, Xmlizer, jkroll, Wikidata-bugs, Jdouglas, aude, Tobias1984, Manybubbles, Mbch331
Cc: Smalyshev, Lydia_Pintscher, Liuxinyu970226, Aklapper, Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE, ArthurPSmith, Nandana, Lahi, Gq86, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, EBjune, merbst, LawExplorer, _jensen, Jonas, Xmlizer, jkroll, Wikidata-bugs, Jdouglas, aude, Tobias1984, Manybubbles, Mbch331
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
