Addshore added a comment.
In T217897#5062728 <https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T217897#5062728>, @Smalyshev wrote: > > the cache we are talking about there would be unnecessary if the wdqs just hit varnish. > > It is problematic for WDQS to "just hit varnish", because varnish does not know if certain revision is the latest one available or not. Wikidata on the other hand does. Again my flipped way of looking at that is that WDQS does know what the latest version of the entity that it is trying to get updates for is, therefor, it should probably just ask for it. TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T217897 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: Addshore Cc: Addshore, Smalyshev, BBlack, Aklapper, Gehel, alaa_wmde, Legado_Shulgin, CucyNoiD, Nandana, NebulousIris, thifranc, AndyTan, Gaboe420, Versusxo, Majesticalreaper22, Giuliamocci, Davinaclare77, Adrian1985, Qtn1293, Cpaulf30, Lahi, Gq86, Baloch007, Darkminds3113, Bsandipan, Lordiis, Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE, GoranSMilovanovic, Adik2382, Th3d3v1ls, Hfbn0, Ramalepe, Liugev6, QZanden, EBjune, merbst, LawExplorer, Lewizho99, Zppix, Maathavan, _jensen, rosalieper, Jonas, Xmlizer, Wong128hk, jkroll, Wikidata-bugs, Jdouglas, aude, Tobias1984, Manybubbles, faidon, Mbch331, Jay8g, fgiunchedi
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
