Michael added a comment.
@lucamauri Your feedback is very welcome and helpful. Thank you! In T218282#5114315 <https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T218282#5114315>, @lucamauri wrote: > - If this is the right place to add the text depends on what we consider //Standard// and //Advanced// configuration. I agree to put this specific text where you suggest to, but then I am not sure any longer if it make sense to have two separate installation instructions page, instead of one well-organized one Yes, I intended to prune the other "Advanced" config to remove duplication. I suggested adding this content to the main installation page, because the Item pages feel actively broken/incomplete without it, since the sitelinks are such a large section on the Item page. > - The candidate documentation in my opinion fails to explain the user the concepts behind. As I wrote above, I consider this of paramount importance. The paragraph is titled `Enable SiteLinks`, but nowhere is explained what a "SiteLink" is or what relation has with "Direct Access". In the brief introduction I wrote, those terms were at least referenced and linked Yes, some introduction is a good idea. I would like to focus here more on getting the sitelinks on the Item pages to work and have a guide about Direct Access on the advanced config page or somewhere else. > - Are we sure that `Extension:WikimediaMessages` must be installed to edit messages? In my installation I was able to modify them by simply editing the page `MediaWiki:Wikibase-sitelinks-yourgroupnamehere` No, `Extension:WikimediaMessages` is only needed if one wants to use the default/example settings. Apparently, I should phrase this clearer. Or maybe drop it completely, because 3rd Party installations will likely never use it. > - I would move `$wgWBRepoSettings` //after// the instructions about Sites (if not, //above// and //below// must be adapted) I moved it towards step 1, because I find it important to think about the desired structure in the sidebar //before// adding sites to the table, as changing the sites table again afterwards can be annoying. But you are right, when incorporating your lines I missed adjusting some words. Will fix :) > - It seems to me that using `Special:SetSiteLink` is less user-friendly than setting the SiteLink in the related box in the item's page True, I mainly intended it as a verification step, as the SiteLink widget in the related box in the item's page can give for some problems no error message at all. However, you are very right as far as everyday usage is concerned. > - I think the wiki where //Repository// is installed should be referenced in a clearer way in respect to simply //your wiki//: as we are always talking about wikis, I am not sure it is clear to the users what is the //consumer// and what the //consumed// one Good point, I will make this clearer. TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T218282 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: Michael Cc: Ladsgroup, johl, Addshore, lucamauri, Aklapper, Lea_Lacroix_WMDE, Lydia_Pintscher, alaa_wmde, Nandana, Lahi, Gq86, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, LawExplorer, _jensen, rosalieper, Jonas, Wikidata-bugs, aude, Mbch331
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
