Snaterlicious added a comment. I my opinion, specifically developing for Wikidata would be opening Pandora's box. We already have rather awkward Wikidata-specifics in the the code (Calendar types reference Wikidata items, for example) and, from my point of view, dealing with gadgets is already a critical aspect (we should, for example, find a way to reflect the AuthorityControl gadget's functionality in Wikibase core as soon as possible which, actually, points into a similar direction). I am not sure whether every third party would like to access Wikidata (or any web service at all) for running their Wikibase installation and I remain advocating having an independent and flexible stand-alone software. When configuring Wikidata, why should those configuration options and the corresponding logic be separated from Wikibase? That points into the direction of having a Wikidata release and a Wikibase release, eventually.
TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T86528 REPLY HANDLER ACTIONS Reply to comment or attach files, or !close, !claim, !unsubscribe or !assign <username>. EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: Snaterlicious Cc: Aklapper, daniel, JanZerebecki, adrianheine, Snaterlicious, thiemowmde, JeroenDeDauw, aude, Tobi_WMDE_SW, Stryn, Smalyshev, Wikidata-bugs _______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
