Orienteerix added a comment.
@bert I think this is great proposal! When defining a format (or standard or API...) that is interest for significant user group there is need to balance ease of use to amount of features in the format. In any case, as shown in the proposal, I think that the idea of having possibiity to include metadata of the multiple images to same file is good since, for example, single historical map could consist of multiple images. I think the list shared by @Abbe98 is also useful for finding many possible features to include. Historical maps that are rectified likely do not suffer from the geographical location inaccuracy caused by the use of EPSG:4326. Also, EPSG:4326 has been removed from GeoJSON standard because of the interoperability issues. On the orher hand, even though GeoJSON does not officially support other than EPSG:4326 other projections are also used with it. For example, Oskari <http://www.oskari.org/> can use EPSG:3067 in GeoJSONs. In any case, even though also GDAL supports various projections in georectification, I think a bit to think here is also if the metadata format for georectification is to be standard at some point in future. TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T227036 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: bert, Orienteerix Cc: Orienteerix, Abbe98, SandraF_WMF, Susannaanas, Aklapper, bert, darthmon_wmde, Ferenczy, Nandana, JKSTNK, Lahi, PDrouin-WMF, Gq86, E1presidente, Ramsey-WMF, Cparle, Anooprao, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, Tramullas, Acer, LawExplorer, Salgo60, Silverfish, _jensen, rosalieper, Jane023, Wikidata-bugs, Base, matthiasmullie, aude, Ricordisamoa, Wesalius, Lydia_Pintscher, Fabrice_Florin, Raymond, Steinsplitter, Mbch331
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
