daniel added a comment.

  In T214362#5338030 <https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T214362#5338030>, 
@Addshore wrote:
  
  > In T214362#5324623 <https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T214362#5324623>, 
@daniel wrote:
  >
  >> Most importantly, the proposal assumes the existence of a "more permanent 
storage solution" which is not readily available. This would have to be created.
  >
  > I guess the closest thing we have like it right now would be the parser 
cache system backed by MySQL.
  
  I'd be interested in your thoughts on T227776: Generalize ParserCache into a 
generic service class for large "current" page-derived data 
<https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T227776>.

TASK DETAIL
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T214362

EMAIL PREFERENCES
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/

To: daniel
Cc: mobrovac, abian, Lydia_Pintscher, Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE, Marostegui, Joe, 
daniel, Agabi10, Aklapper, Addshore, darthmon_wmde, holger.knust, Nandana, 
kostajh, Lahi, Gq86, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, merbst, LawExplorer, _jensen, 
rosalieper, D3r1ck01, Pchelolo, SBisson, Eevans, Hardikj, Wikidata-bugs, aude, 
GWicke, jayvdb, fbstj, santhosh, Jdforrester-WMF, Ladsgroup, Mbch331, Rxy, 
Jay8g, Ltrlg, bd808, Legoktm
_______________________________________________
Wikidata-bugs mailing list
Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs

Reply via email to