alaa_wmde added a comment.
In T48643#5364763 <https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T48643#5364763>, @Ladsgroup wrote: > In T48643#5363240 <https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T48643#5363240>, @alaa_wmde wrote: > >> This sounds like a nice idea.. >> In order to be able to order this in proper priority, do we have any measurements/hypothesis on what we would solve/gain with this change? or is it just anticipating future risks and trying to proactively do something? > > On gains, This is more about resilience IMO. We have two documented incident regarding dispatching <https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?search=dispatching+prefix%3AIncident+documentation%2F&title=Special%3ASearch&go=Go&ns0=1&ns12=1&ns116=1&ns498=1> but I think there are more. There have been scheduled down times due to reboot of mwmaint nodes, etc. All of them would be avoided. I say this might gives us another 9 in dipsatching uptime. Would that work for you? Yeap that's more info to include here, thanks! TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T48643 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: alaa_wmde Cc: alaa_wmde, Ladsgroup, Joe, Addshore, Aklapper, Tobi_WMDE_SW, JanZerebecki, Wikidata-bugs, Abraham, Nemo_bis, Denny, aude, Ricordisamoa, Lydia_Pintscher, daniel, hoo, darthmon_wmde, DannyS712, Nandana, Lahi, Gq86, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, LawExplorer, _jensen, rosalieper, Mbch331
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
