Yurik added a comment.
P.S. @Fnielsen does bring a valid point about various linked lexemes , and
that might be useful -- for example if lexeme lists another lexeme as being a
synonym, it would be good to show it as a word rather than an L-number.
That said, I do not believe we need it just yet -- it will take a while for
the synonyms to be populated to the level of wiktionary, so for now lexemes
will be needed just for the "infoboxes" -- e.g. list all forms and basic info,
not the advanced features.
At this point, I can easily replace the `{{noun ru|...}}` template (generates
morphology summary and a forms table), but I won't be able to easily replace
the synonyms section with the auto-generated content, and thus, linked lexemes
are somewhat useless until they have much better coverage.
TASK DETAIL
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T212843
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: Yurik
Cc: TomT0m, Yurik, Vesihiisi, ArthurPSmith, Iniquity, Tobias1984, Theklan,
Fnielsen, RexxS, Pamputt, Mike_Peel, MarcoSwart, Geertivp, Liuxinyu970226,
Addshore, Jdforrester-WMF, deryckchan, Lydia_Pintscher, Lea_Lacroix_WMDE,
darthmon_wmde, DannyS712, Nandana, Mringgaard, Lahi, Gq86, Cinemantique,
GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, LawExplorer, _jensen, rosalieper, jberkel,
Psychoslave, Wikidata-bugs, aude, GPHemsley, Shizhao, Nemo_bis, Darkdadaah,
Mbch331, Ltrlg, Krenair
_______________________________________________
Wikidata-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
