Nuria added a comment.
> So, it seems we have 2 completely separate definitions of "structured data":
Well, the intent of these numbers is not to measure "structured data usage"
nor to define that concept. The intent is to measure the impact of the
structure data on commons project per @Abit initial request couple weeks ago.
With that objective in mind I do not see the Wikidata usage on commons to be
of relevance as that usage it is not directly tied to the work the team working
on "structure data on commons" is been doing. Please do let me know if this is
not a correct statement.
As a side note I think the true interesting metric is the rate of growth of
the result of the query below. Following rate of growth of usage of structured
data on commons growths seems much more relevant to track impact than the
absolute numbers we have been talking about to date.
SELECT DISTINCT page_id
FROM page
INNER JOIN slots ON slot_revision_id = page_latest
INNER JOIN content ON slot_content_id = content_id AND content_size >
122
INNER JOIN slot_roles ON role_id = slot_role_id AND role_name =
'mediainfo'
TASK DETAIL
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T239565
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: Milimetric, Nuria
Cc: Abit, Ramsey-WMF, kzimmerman, Addshore, matthiasmullie, gsingers,
Mayakp.wiki, Ladsgroup, nettrom_WMF, Cparle, Nuria, Milimetric, mpopov,
4748kitoko, darthmon_wmde, DannyS712, Nandana, JKSTNK, Akovalyov, Lahi,
PDrouin-WMF, Gq86, E1presidente, Anooprao, SandraF_WMF, GoranSMilovanovic,
QZanden, Tramullas, Acer, LawExplorer, Salgo60, Silverfish, _jensen,
rosalieper, Scott_WUaS, Susannaanas, JAllemandou, Jane023, terrrydactyl,
Wikidata-bugs, Base, aude, Ricordisamoa, Wesalius, Lydia_Pintscher,
Fabrice_Florin, Raymond, Steinsplitter, Mbch331, jeremyb
_______________________________________________
Wikidata-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
