thiemowmde added a comment.

  Thanks a lot for the detailed response! However, I feel my main point got 
lost. My question really is what the benefit of an isolated unit test for 
"being compatible with PSR-16" is? It's not like the class 
SimpleCacheWithBagOStuff is used in isolation. It's not even used in an 
external context we don't know anything about but that it expects compatibility 
with PSR-16. No. This class is used in Wikibase. We know where it is used. My 
question is: Isn't it enough to have good coverage for all the code that is 
using this class?
  "Coverage" is not about a number. Coverage is about the team having 
confidence the code they own does not break without a test protecting them. As 
far as I can see these tests exist.



To: Rosalie_WMDE, thiemowmde
Cc: Rosalie_WMDE, Addshore, Daimona, Jdforrester-WMF, Ladsgroup, thiemowmde, 
Aklapper, MaxSem, Iflorez, darthmon_wmde, alaa_wmde, Nandana, Lahi, Gq86, 
GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, LawExplorer, _jensen, rosalieper, Scott_WUaS, 
Jonas, Wikidata-bugs, aude, Lydia_Pintscher, Mbch331
Wikidata-bugs mailing list

Reply via email to