RexxS added a comment.

  Well it didn't seem to cause a problem for all of the statements imported 
from the various Wikipedias.
  
  It also doesn't seem to cause a problem for anybody using the enwiki 'short 
description helper', which silently and invisibly adds a Wikidata description 
whenever the enwiki short description is added. I'm not seeing any difference 
in licensing issues between that and the proposed updating bot.
  
  Wikidata remains unsuitable as a repository for article descriptions because 
of (1) its tardy response to vandalism of the description field; (2) the 
inability of a mechanism to validate the description field; (3) the lack of a 
mature and nuanced BLP policy that would prevent subtle but serious breaches of 
enwiki policies on living persons.

TASK DETAIL
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T184000

EMAIL PREFERENCES
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/

To: Tgr, RexxS
Cc: DannyS712, Liuxinyu970226, Lofhi, MGChecker, Pbsouthwood, Deskana, Catrope, 
RexxS, Nikerabbit, Dbrant, Jdlrobson, Stashbot, WMDE-leszek, Elitre, gerritbot, 
TheDJ, Fjalapeno, Tbayer, MZMcBride, Alsee, bearND, Mike_Peel, Tgr, JKatzWMF, 
daniel, Bmueller, Addshore, Lydia_Pintscher, Samwilson, Aklapper, DannyH, 
darthmon_wmde, Ddurigon, Mateo1977, Nandana, aezell, Lahi, Gq86, 
GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, Taquo, LawExplorer, catalandres, JJMC89, B20180, 
_jensen, rosalieper, Scott_WUaS, Karthik_sripal, SBisson, Nakon, MusikAnimal, 
Fhocutt, Wikidata-bugs, Mooeypoo, aude, Ricordisamoa, -jem-, Jdforrester-WMF, 
Mbch331, Krenair
_______________________________________________
Wikidata-bugs mailing list
Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs

Reply via email to