dcausse added a comment.
In T244341#6097277 <https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T244341#6097277>, @Pfps wrote: > I don't understand why it was considered necessary to make a breaking change the RDF dump to improve WDQS performance when there is a solution that does not make a breaking change to the dump. It was not considered "necessary" it was considered "preferable" in discussions we had while drafting this 4 steps plan. The sole reason was to limit the divergences between WDQS results and the dumps (current divergences are listed here <https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Wikibase/Indexing/RDF_Dump_Format#WDQS_data_differences>). I'm perfectly fine dropping this step (assuming others agree) if this causes much annoyance and only deprecate blank nodes at the WDQS level (I've updated the description of this ticket to reflect the discussions we had on the wikipage). TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T244341 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: dcausse Cc: Multichill, Pfps, Mmarx, Dipsacus_fullonum, Luitzen, VladimirAlexiev, Lea_Lacroix_WMDE, Jheald, Daniel_Mietchen, mkroetzsch, Denny, Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE, Aklapper, dcausse, CBogen, darthmon_wmde, Viztor, 94rain, Nandana, Lahi, Gq86, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, EBjune, merbst, LawExplorer, _jensen, rosalieper, Scott_WUaS, Jonas, Xmlizer, jkroll, Wikidata-bugs, Jdouglas, Snowolf, aude, Tobias1984, Manybubbles, Shizhao, Mbch331, Rxy
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
