dcausse added a comment.
In T244341#6124638 <https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T244341#6124638>, @Pfps wrote: > If 'unskolemizing' is a trivial step then that should be implemented by WDQS, instead of pushing it to every consumer (including indirect consumers) of Wikidata information, if this change is simply a change to make WDQS work faster. WDQS does need to "skolemize" not "unskolemize" but in the end this is the same discussion as pondering whether or not we want WDQS to be close to Wikibase RDF output by moving the "skolemization" before generating the RDF output. Yes this change is only to make the update process faster by removing the complexity and cost induced by tracking blank nodes. Since all edits to wikidata now depend directly on the efficiency of this process we believe that it is worth this breaking change. TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T244341 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: dcausse Cc: Gehel, Multichill, Pfps, Mmarx, Dipsacus_fullonum, Luitzen, VladimirAlexiev, Lea_Lacroix_WMDE, Jheald, Daniel_Mietchen, mkroetzsch, Denny, Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE, Aklapper, dcausse, CBogen, darthmon_wmde, Viztor, 94rain, Nandana, Lahi, Gq86, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, EBjune, merbst, LawExplorer, _jensen, rosalieper, Scott_WUaS, Jonas, Xmlizer, jkroll, Wikidata-bugs, Jdouglas, Snowolf, aude, Tobias1984, Manybubbles, Shizhao, Mbch331, Rxy
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
