mkroetzsch added a comment.

The RDF should certainly contain information about the entity type of exported 
data. This is essential to ensure that the RDF data contains all the 
information that is found in the JSON (other than the ordering). As I read it, 
things that are of rdf:type Item are things that are described by on item on 
Wikidata. If this is not obvious to anybody who uses the data (maybe somebody 
really thinks that Washington himself is an item?!), we can always emphasize 
this in the documentation of the Item class. I therefore suggest to close this 
issue as invalid. It's just a matter of how we document our ontology. In 
particular, it should not be assumed that any triple in RDF has a self-evident 
ground truth associated with it that one can grasp just by reading the URIs (or 
their labels), though I think confusion is very unlikely here since we do not 
export any RDF data about item documents.

The comment on rdfs:Resource seems to be a misinterpretation of the spec. In 
RDF, we certainly distinguish between a thing and its description, it is just 
that the description itself is yet another thing (in short: everything is a 
thing). I don't think that this has any bearing on how we want to encode the 
entity type in our RDF.

In general, I would suggest to stick to the RDF encoding that Denny and I have 
worked out and published, as it is used in the existing dumps. We can always 
discuss changes if really needed, but we should not start to re-discuss things 
that are already done. What is needed now is implementation, not design.


TASK DETAIL
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T89949

REPLY HANDLER ACTIONS
  Reply to comment or attach files, or !close, !claim, !unsubscribe or !assign 
<username>.

EMAIL PREFERENCES
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/

To: mkroetzsch
Cc: Smalyshev, mkroetzsch, Aklapper, daniel, Wikidata-bugs, Jdouglas, aude



_______________________________________________
Wikidata-bugs mailing list
Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs

Reply via email to