dcausse added a comment.

  In T244341#6646657 <https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T244341#6646657>, 
@ericP wrote:
  
  > For reasons that I believe have to do with additional data not changing 
already inferred facts (AKA monotonicity), certain OWL constructs MUST be 
expressed as a blank node. I think it's a great idea to remove blank notes 
wherever possible in wikidata but if you want the data to be conformant with 
OWL (and thus work in e.g. Protégé, OWLAPI, and some other tools), I believe 
you are stick using blank nodes for some OWL expressions 
<https://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-mapping-to-rdf/#Axioms_Represented_by_Blank_Nodes>.
  
  This was indeed brought up in earlier discussions, my understanding about OWL 
and the wikidata RDF representation is that it embarks some OWL expressions as 
part of its RDF but is not explicitly defined as being OWL compliant (at least 
not explicitly per 
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Wikibase/Indexing/RDF_Dump_Format).
  The removal of blank nodes will follow 
https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-skolemization and a user willing 
to use strict OWL semantic using the RDF produced by wikidata can easily do 
this by transforming the skolem IRIs (//.well-known// IRIs) back to blank nodes.
  This probably deserves its own discussion but I'm curious about OWL usecases 
that rely on the existing OWL constraints present in the wikidata RDF. If you 
are aware of such usecases I'd love to hear them.

TASK DETAIL
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T244341

EMAIL PREFERENCES
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/

To: dcausse
Cc: ericP, JMinor, TomT0m, Gehel, Multichill, Pfps, Mmarx, Dipsacus_fullonum, 
Luitzen, VladimirAlexiev, Lea_Lacroix_WMDE, Jheald, Daniel_Mietchen, 
mkroetzsch, Denny, Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE, Aklapper, dcausse, CBogen, 
Akuckartz, Viztor, 94rain, Nandana, Namenlos314, Lahi, Gq86, GoranSMilovanovic, 
QZanden, EBjune, merbst, LawExplorer, _jensen, rosalieper, Scott_WUaS, Jonas, 
Xmlizer, jkroll, Wikidata-bugs, Jdouglas, Snowolf, aude, Tobias1984, 
Manybubbles, Shizhao, Mbch331, Rxy
_______________________________________________
Wikidata-bugs mailing list
Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs

Reply via email to