Nikki added a comment.

  In T269724#6684661 <https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T269724#6684661>, 
@abian wrote:
  
  > I understand the motivation (thanks to the fact that Nikki's tasks are much 
more interesting and better described than mine), :-)
  
  I can't take the credit for the task description, that's Lydia's work. :)
  
  > but I believe we should strive to contain the complexity of the constraint 
system and, if possible, reduce the current complexity, which is quite high. 
The need that the example represents might not be recurrent and, for that case, 
I think we could have two Properties, one for Items and one for Forms, to 
better adjust the constraints (not only the one we're commenting on) and 
statements of each of them to their cases of use. I wouldn't find it a big 
problem if there were some similar statements on two different Properties, as 
they aren't expected to change frequently and they'll be used in different 
namespaces (so both shouldn't appear together or be read by the same software 
agents that might know about one Property but not about the other). Please 
don't hate me for this (hate me for something elseā€¦).
  
  I don't think it would be a good idea to split this property. It serves 
exactly the same purpose in both places - to link to a file containing the 
pronunciation of a word - and multiple almost identical properties makes it 
harder for people to use the right one in the right place. It already took me a 
long time to stop accidentally using the "audio" property instead of 
"pronunciation audio".
  
  The property constraints themselves don't seem that complex to me. The main 
problem I have is that the way we model/describe them is quite abstract and 
technical and I can never remember exactly which properties/values I need to 
use. Most people should never need to touch property constraints though.

TASK DETAIL
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T269724

EMAIL PREFERENCES
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/

To: Nikki
Cc: abian, Lydia_Pintscher, Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE, Nikki, Aklapper, Akuckartz, 
Nandana, Lahi, Gq86, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, LawExplorer, _jensen, 
rosalieper, Agabi10, Scott_WUaS, Wikidata-bugs, aude, Mbch331
_______________________________________________
Wikidata-bugs mailing list
Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs

Reply via email to