So9q added a comment.
In T206560#6849671 <https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T206560#6849671>, @Krabina wrote: > Interesting. From my (limited) experience, neo4j <https://github.com/neo4j/neo4j> seems to get a lot of attention. > > BTW: there was a discussion about triple store experiences at the SMWCon last year inlcuding blazegraph, virtuoso and jena: https://youtu.be/AB_dwxG_vEs https://github.com/neo4j/neo4j is written in Java. I personally don't like Java software. My experience is that they seldom scale well and you always got the VM overhead. Also I think the language might be dying it's not a good choice for anything new these days IMO. Rust on the other hand seems very attractive from a horizontal scaling viewpoint and I really like that the compiler is so strict that runtime errors are often turns up at compile time instead. That's a huge plus over e.g. C++ which seldom complaines at compile time and you have errors pop up during runtime instead. See this simple comparison <https://medium.com/@dexterdarwich/comparison-between-java-go-and-rust-fdb21bd5fb7c> for an idea how efficient Rust is compared to Java for backend services. TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T206560 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: So9q Cc: So9q, Krabina, Jecummings4, TomT0m, Akuckartz, Susannaanas, Addshore, Andrawaag, Gehel, Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE, Aklapper, Smalyshev, MPhamWMF, Jtm-lis, NavinRizwi, CBogen, Isaacandy, Demian, Nandana, Namenlos314, Lahi, Gq86, Bryandamon, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, EBjune, merbst, LawExplorer, _jensen, rosalieper, Scott_WUaS, Jonas, Xmlizer, Steko, Samwilson, PhotographerTom, suriyaa, Psychoslave, tosfos, jkroll, Wikidata-bugs, Jdouglas, aude, Tobias1984, Darenwelsh, Dinoguy1000, Manybubbles, Foxtrott, brion, Mbch331, Rxy, MarkAHershberger
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
