Harej added a comment.
This seems like an arbitrary way to cut up Wikidata. It very much smacks of "let's take the largest subset of our dataset and evict it," without consideration to why the dataset should be cut up this way. What are the boundaries of these new projects? Is Wikidata a graph for everything except scholarly articles? What about books, or other forms of citable media (i.e., any and all media)? What about scholarly articles that are relevant to the Wikidata graph in ways other than WikiCite's massive citation graph? I am very interested in the subgraph conversation and how we can envision Wikidata as part of a massive linked data ecosystem without itself being overly burdened. I think evicting arbitrary subsets of the data is just not good strategy. If I were to suggest a change, perhaps we could divide the graph along "media" and "not media". (We can subsequently decide if we want to split "not media" further.) This I think would draw lines that are coherent and not arbitrary. The scholarly articles would be a part of the media graph project. And there would be free cross-referencing between the sites. Do you think this would achieve your goals? TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T281854 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: Harej Cc: Harej, Lydia_Pintscher, Mohammed_Sadat_WMDE, nichtich, EgonWillighagen, Fnielsen, Darwinius, Daniel_Mietchen, Lokal_Profil, GoEThe, Alicia_Fagerving_WMSE, PKM, LWyatt, Multichill, Aklapper, MPhamWMF, Invadibot, maantietaja, CBogen, Akuckartz, Nandana, Namenlos314, Lahi, Gq86, Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, EBjune, merbst, LawExplorer, _jensen, rosalieper, Scott_WUaS, Jonas, Xmlizer, jkroll, Wikidata-bugs, Jdouglas, aude, Tobias1984, Manybubbles, Mbch331
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list -- wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe send an email to wikidata-bugs-le...@lists.wikimedia.org
