Esc3300 added a comment.
In T236295#7163227 <https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T236295#7163227>, @ChristianKl wrote: > I still believe that is_exception_to_constraint in the reference section would be the best way. (I create the property proposal) > > I still don't see the case against that proposal. Can someone make it here? Maybe the exception https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q16645 for most constraints on https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P5086 : it could be a bunch of statements on https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q16645 , but it's unclear if that would really be better. OTH, for T275392 <https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T275392> anything that is based on the items directly seems preferable, even if it may not be theoretically appealing to non-contributors. It's still a valid constraint for these items and exceptions should be double-checked. TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T236295 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: Esc3300 Cc: abian, ChristianKl, Esc3300, Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE, Aklapper, Bugreporter, Invadibot, maantietaja, Akuckartz, Nandana, Lahi, Gq86, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, LawExplorer, _jensen, rosalieper, Agabi10, Scott_WUaS, Wikidata-bugs, aude, Mbch331
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list -- wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe send an email to wikidata-bugs-le...@lists.wikimedia.org
