Smalyshev added a comment. I lowered the priority because whatever is the licensing question is, I'm pretty sure it does not prevent any usage of the RDF data, as licensing of the Wikidata data is widely known and there's no copyright issue with it. Thus, I would consider it to be of a lower priority than data issues that we're dealing now. That doesn't mean it should not be considered or fixed - that just means it's less pressing currently than, say, figuring out how to represent dates or labels or quantities right. Of course, I can be mistaken in this regard and then the priority would be raised.
> That is, change the triples whose subject is /wiki/Special:EntityData/Q1 to > /wiki/Special:EntityData/Q1.ttl (et al). Not sure it's a good idea since .ttl is just a format, we're describing the data item, not a format. I.e. Q1.ttl, Q1.rdf and Q1.nt describe the same thing, just use the different bytes to do it. Thus, I don't think it is right to make them generate different triples. Unfortunately, I don't know any way in RDF to have a triple relating to "this document" (as opposed to "data presented in this document") but if you do please suggest. Then we could attach license info to that. TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T73991 REPLY HANDLER ACTIONS Reply to comment or attach files, or !close, !claim, !unsubscribe or !assign <username>. EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: Smalyshev Cc: Smalyshev, Nevalicori, Wikidata-bugs, Lydia_Pintscher, daniel, aude _______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
