mkroetzsch added a comment.

@hoo Thanks for the heads up! I do have comments.

(1) I would remove the "full" and "truthy" distinction from the path and rather 
make this part of the dump type (for example "statements" and 
"truthy-statements"). The reason is that we have many full dumps (terms, 
sitelinks, statements, properties), which can be readily exported in RDF and 
JSON, but we have only one "truthy" dump and it really is mainly for RDF (at 
least we did not discuss a JSON format for "single-triple statements"). 
Therefore, it does not seem worth to make a top-level distinction in the 
directory structure for this. For consumers, it is easier if a dump file is 
addressed with four components (projectname, dumptype, date, file format). The 
truthy/full distinction would be another parameter that does not seem to add 
any functionality.

(2) My comment right at the beginning of this bug report was to have 
timestamped subdirectories, just like we have for the main dumps. Maybe you 
have reasons for not having these, but could you explain them here?


TASK DETAIL
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T72385

REPLY HANDLER ACTIONS
  Reply to comment or attach files, or !close, !claim, !unsubscribe or !assign 
<username>.

EMAIL PREFERENCES
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/

To: ArielGlenn, mkroetzsch
Cc: Manybubbles, JanZerebecki, Smalyshev, aude, daniel, Wikidata-bugs, 
Nemo_bis, mkroetzsch, Svick, ArielGlenn, Lydia_Pintscher, hoo, jeremyb



_______________________________________________
Wikidata-bugs mailing list
Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs

Reply via email to