Manuel added a comment.
> all 6h should be included in 24h, all 24h should be included in 48h, and all 48h should be included in 72h This was the logic that I followed for debugging the tool, nothing more. I explained this only for you to understand why I think that the data shown made no sense at that time. This is not relevant beyond that. > if we keep the top 100 items per number of editors, then the top 100 in the 72h dataset might encompass > all items with at least, say, 7 editors, while in the 6h dataset at the same time we could have the situation > that no items have even reached 7 editors yet; Yes, this is no problem. **Sorting:** - primary: number of editors (high numbers first) - secondary: number of edits (high numbers first) **Filters:** - min 2 editors - max 100 lines per table from top Please let me know if you need any more information. TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T296387 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: Manuel Cc: Tobi_WMDE_SW, GoranSMilovanovic, Aklapper, Manuel, Invadibot, maantietaja, Akuckartz, Nandana, Lahi, Gq86, QZanden, LawExplorer, _jensen, rosalieper, Scott_WUaS, Wikidata-bugs, aude, Mbch331
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
