ItamarWMDE added a comment.
> You can't just decide that the first two paragraphs a part of some ad hoc "core" of the data-model and the third paragraph is just supplementary and doesn't matter anymore. I am really not sure where this interpretation is coming from. I'm not ignoring this paragraph, I referred to it before in this conversation and I believe it only strengthens my point: **"can be constructed based on the ranks defined above"** is exactly where I get that there are core values to rank, and that "best" isn't one of them. At this point, I would like to stop and ask how useful this discussion is? I have not seen an argument that gives any examples as to how expecting our interface consumers (that is, users) to know about the three values allowed in rank, and their ordering "preferred then normal, never deprecated" makes the system harder to use, harder to reason about or even fails to implement some domain logic. I would suggest focusing this debate on finding a solution rather than just continuing this circular argumentation. Likewise, I'm not here to target anyone, I try to present examples to back up my reasoning, and I would like to receive the same courtesy from you. TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T305535 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: ItamarWMDE Cc: Addshore, WMDE-leszek, Lydia_Pintscher, Aklapper, Nikki, Mahir256, Bugreporter, Erdinc_Ciftci_WMDE, guergana.tzatchkova, ItamarWMDE, noarave, Michael, Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE, Astuthiodit_1, karapayneWMDE, Invadibot, maantietaja, Akuckartz, Nandana, lucamauri, Lahi, Gq86, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, LawExplorer, _jensen, rosalieper, Bodhisattwa, Scott_WUaS, Wikidata-bugs, aude, Mbch331
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
