Agabi10 added a comment.
In T277826#7926652 <https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T277826#7926652>, @Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE wrote: > Note that it’s also possible to have only a replacement value but no replacement property. In this case should I assume that the same property with a different value should be used instead? One of the few examples currently where replacement value without replacement property is used is P9650 <https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P9650>, should the message in this claim <https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q24081287#P9650> be something like this? > An entity should not have a statement for Internet Game Database company ID if it also has a statement for instance of with value company. Use instance of with value video game developer instead. If the same property should be used not repeating the "instance of" property in the replacement part makes the message more confusing, because it's not that clear if the property that needs a change is the one that triggered the constraint message or the other one. Additionally, we could also make that if "replacement value" is provided "replacement property" would be mandatory for the constraint to be valid, that way there wouldn't be confusion about which of the properties should have its value replaced. TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T277826 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: Agabi10 Cc: Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE, Pamputt, Esc3300, Bugreporter, Aklapper, Agabi10, Astuthiodit_1, karapayneWMDE, Invadibot, maantietaja, ItamarWMDE, Akuckartz, Eihel, Nandana, Lahi, Gq86, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, LawExplorer, _jensen, rosalieper, Scott_WUaS, abian, Wikidata-bugs, aude, Mbch331
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
