Lydia_Pintscher added a comment.
In T321224#8521681 <https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T321224#8521681>, @Isaac wrote: > @Lydia_Pintscher I was reminded recently of Recoin <https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Recoin> (and the closely related PropertySuggester <https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:PropertySuggester>) and that got me wondering: is there a reason that the ORES model was used instead of Recoin? Or maybe more specifically, is there any reason not to use Recoin for assessing Wikidata item quality? What are its drawbacks? > > Looking through it, my impression was that it's quite good and that my approach likely would have been very similar. I do see a few places we could augment it: > > - Also assessing references in a similar way (based on how often a property is referenced on other items) to identify claims where references are missing or could be improved (e.g., imported from wikipedia) > - Also assessing labels/descriptions based on which language sitelinks exist for the item -- e.g., if Japanese Wikipedia article, should also have Japanese label/description > > And then I know you asked about Properties / Lexemes -- presumably this same strategy could be adopted for them if it's indeed working well for items! Recoin I believe didn't exist at that point. It was also not integrated in the existing production systems. I don't think we ever did a proper analysis of what it's currently capable of and how good it is for judging Item quality. TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T321224 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: Isaac, Lydia_Pintscher Cc: Lydia_Pintscher, diego, Miriam, Isaac, Astuthiodit_1, karapayneWMDE, Invadibot, Ywats0ns, maantietaja, ItamarWMDE, Akuckartz, Nandana, Abdeaitali, Lahi, Gq86, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, LawExplorer, Avner, _jensen, rosalieper, Scott_WUaS, Wikidata-bugs, aude, Capt_Swing, Mbch331
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
