Manuel added a comment.
Cool, thank you! > the next dump will be made on the 19th, so I'll go ahead and rerun the process then I don't think that there should be significant changes on that scale. So no need to rerun. > How do we want to document this? We might create a little report for this and the coming WDQS task. > Would this be a case where we'd put the notebook on GitHub for reference? I think so, yes: In terms of code documentation GitHub would make sense to me. That way we can link to it in the report and we (and others) can find it easily in the repo in case we need to rerun it. What would you think makes most sense? TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T337021 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: AndrewTavis_WMDE, Manuel Cc: Manuel, Aklapper, Lydia_Pintscher, Astuthiodit_1, AWesterinen, karapayneWMDE, Invadibot, maantietaja, ItamarWMDE, Akuckartz, Nandana, Namenlos314, Lahi, Gq86, Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, EBjune, merbst, LawExplorer, _jensen, rosalieper, Scott_WUaS, Jonas, Xmlizer, jkroll, Wikidata-bugs, Jdouglas, aude, Tobias1984, Manybubbles, Mbch331
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
