AndrewTavis_WMDE added a comment.
Looking at this further, it seems that AKhatun focussed more on scholarly articles and was just listing subclasses in the report itself as examples. Reference for this is this part of the report <https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:AKhatun/Wikidata_Scholarly_Articles_Subgraph_Analysis#Definition_of_Scholarly_Articles>. > Scholarly articles have the largest count (37M) while everything else combined is in the thousands (~130K, excluding those that are included in scholarly articles), therefore the analysis is more focused on scholarly articles than others. Of the ones that were listed, scientific journal (Q5633421 <https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q5633421>), scholarly conference abstract (Q58632367 <https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q58632367>) and conference paper: (Q23927052 <https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q23927052>) are not direct subclasses of scholarly article, so maybe what we can focus on is the direct subclasses of scholarly article and the three that are not included as well? I'd say that scientific journals would be needed for the new graph as well 🤔 TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T342123 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: AndrewTavis_WMDE Cc: dcausse, Lydia_Pintscher, dr0ptp4kt, Aklapper, Manuel, Danny_Benjafield_WMDE, Astuthiodit_1, karapayneWMDE, Invadibot, maantietaja, ItamarWMDE, Akuckartz, Nandana, Lahi, Gq86, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, LawExplorer, _jensen, rosalieper, Scott_WUaS, Wikidata-bugs, aude, Mbch331
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
