Bawolff added a comment.

  This also seems to be really demonstrating the value of phan taint check. So 
far it seems like most of the found issues are in some corner that 
phan-taint-check can't analyze
  
  - mustache templates (+ some skin stuff which I didn't look too closely at. 
Not sure if this is purely due to mustache or if there are additional 
complications)
  - LogFormatter subclasses
  - Pager class hierarchy.
  
  [There's some other one-off things that i think would be more straight 
forward to add to phan-taint-check]
  
  Maybe we should think about how to either refactor these code patterns so we 
can use phan-taint-check on them, or think of ways of making phan taint check 
better.

TASK DETAIL
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T340201

EMAIL PREFERENCES
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/

To: Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE, Bawolff
Cc: Bawolff, Daimona, Nikerabbit, Jdforrester-WMF, Fomafix, Lydia_Pintscher, 
sbassett, jhsoby, kostajh, matmarex, bd808, Michael, Aklapper, 
Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE, Danny_Benjafield_WMDE, Cleo_Lemoisson, Astuthiodit_1, 
karapayneWMDE, Invadibot, Dylsss, Devnull, maantietaja, ItamarWMDE, Akuckartz, 
DannyS712, Nandana, Lahi, Gq86, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, LawExplorer, 
_jensen, rosalieper, Scott_WUaS, Wong128hk, Luke081515, Wikidata-bugs, aude, 
Grunny, csteipp, Mbch331, Jay8g, Krenair, Legoktm
_______________________________________________
Wikidata-bugs mailing list -- wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe send an email to wikidata-bugs-le...@lists.wikimedia.org

Reply via email to