daniel added a comment. @mkroetzsch To me, this isn't really about readability, but conceptual clarity - modeling the precision as an xsd:int using our internal constants seems bad. We should either model them as resources with URIs, or using a *meaningful* number, such as the number of digits in the ISO representation, or the number of seconds or some such.
The current for is fine for sorting and filtering. But for someone looking at the JSON or RDF is's totally unclear what the number means, and it's also unclear how to find out. And to interpret the number correctly, e.g. for formatting, you need to build a big switch statement implementing the somewhat random spec. TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T99907 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: daniel Cc: mkroetzsch, Smalyshev, daniel, thiemowmde, Aklapper, Wikidata-bugs, aude _______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
