Legoktm added a comment. In https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T105091#1489436, @Deskana wrote:
> The issue what to do about suppression of content is still unresolved. The > issue is exceedingly rare; looking at the suppression log, there's only been > two suppressions in the past year where content was removed from Wikidata > items using suppressions. This is not surprising, given the nature of the > data in Wikidata; there are few opportunities to enter free-form text which > could contain suppressable material. > > Given the above, I'm concerned we're over-engineering a solution to a problem > that doesn't really exist in any meaningful sense. Not moving ahead with the > deployment because of a theroetical problem would be a disappointing outcome. It's not a theoretical problem, it's a real one. You said yourself that two such suppressions have occurred. This <https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Security_for_developers/Architecture#What_are_we_trying_to_protect.3F> makes it pretty clear on what we need to protect suppressed content, and the fact WDQS doesn't is a security issue (hence the bug). The solution I proposed in https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T105427#1448872 is rather simple and automates what the legal team apparently wants to do manually? TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T105091 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: Deskana, Legoktm Cc: Lydia_Pintscher, Legoktm, Slaporte, Smalyshev, ZhouZ, ksmith, Aklapper, Deskana, Mpaulson, Wikidata-bugs, aude, Malyacko, P.Copp _______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
