daniel added a comment. In https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T112550#1690455, @JeroenDeDauw wrote:
> Deferred instead of derived? Is that a mistake? The description certainly did > not see a matching change... It's not a mistake. We have two new requirements to meet: - accommodate derived values - accommodate deferred (lazy) deserialization These two were discussed separately before, but for the next generation of the data model, we need to consider both. Which is Important - for example, I can see subclassing working for derived values, but not really for deferred deserialization. I added a reference to https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T90707 to the description when I changed the title. See there for details. TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T112550 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: daniel Cc: hoo, Tobi_WMDE_SW, Jonas, thiemowmde, JeroenDeDauw, Bene, aude, JanZerebecki, Aklapper, Lydia_Pintscher, daniel, Wikidata-bugs _______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
