chasemp added a comment. In https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T112151#1742627, @JanZerebecki wrote:
> In https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T112151#1742574, @chasemp wrote: > > > At first glance, it seems like this means mangling all POST to GET would > > result in an incompatibility with the sparql protocol. > > > I didn't suggest that. I suggested to apply GET semantics to POST requests > that indicate this via a part in the query of their Request-URI. Most of the discussion in this ticket is surrounding https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/243883/ > > > > If we are saying we don't want to leave clients (which follow a somewhat > > odd spec to my mind) in the dust I don't think we are accomplishing that, > > and as Brandon outlined POST in the Wikimedia multi-dc world has specific > > consequences. > > > Would you describe how my suggestion doesn't accomplish that? I wasn't meaning to respond to the outline you provided necessarily, but is anyone being limited by this now? Are users submitting queries from IE at the moment that are limited in this way? I am looking for a use case we are trying to solve. The sort of 'we are trying to do X now and can't because of this' that we can revolve the discussion around. TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T112151 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: Smalyshev, chasemp Cc: chasemp, JanZerebecki, BBlack, Andrew, Deskana, Joe, gerritbot, nichtich, Jneubert, Karima, Aklapper, Smalyshev, JGirault, jkroll, Wikidata-bugs, Jdouglas, aude, Manybubbles _______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
