adrianheine added a comment. In https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T118322#1830709, @Bene wrote:
> In https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T118322#1830597, @adrianheine wrote: > > > What about items that have a sitelink to each other? > > > So far this is only about statements. I don't think there are any cases where > an item links to another item using a sitelink. Probably not, but it's technically possible. I'm just wondering if it wouldn't make more sense to ignore conflicts based on the type of conflict (›colliding sitelinks‹, ›colliding descriptions‹, ›items are linked with each other‹) instead of the location in the entity (›sitelinks‹, ›descriptions‹, ›statements‹). Maybe it would also make sense to use the referenced entities concept from `ReferencedEntitiesDataUpdater`. TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T118322 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: Bene, adrianheine Cc: adrianheine, matej_suchanek, gerritbot, Addshore, Bene, hoo, Ricordisamoa, Nikki, Multichill, Sjoerddebruin, Lydia_Pintscher, agray, I9606, Aklapper, Fnielsen, StudiesWorld, Wikidata-bugs, aude, Mbch331 _______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
