daniel added a comment.

@Physikerwelt I'm confused - what opinion was not respected? Is this about the 
TeX vs MathML thing?

I think the "invalid" bit is a misunderstanding. Thiemo said //-1 means "please 
improve". A -1 with no reason given is invalid//. This is indeed our policy: A 
CR-1 vote needs to come with a reason and way forward, otherwise it's 
considered stonewalling, and can be ignored - though it's preferred to ask for 
clarification before overriding a CR-1. I suppose you consider your inline 
comments to be the reason for the CR-1, but that isn't clear from looking at 
the discussion, or the comments.

FWIW, I don't see how the ontology.owl patch is related to the MathML vs TeX 
discussion. All ontology.owl does is give a description of the data types, it 
doesn't say anything about the format of literals or the structure of values. 
We could mention the format in the description of the data type, but we don't 
do that for any of the other types, and I would consider it a bad idea. It 
would mean mixing two levels of abstraction: the data type is about 
interpretation ("mathematical expression"), the literal type is about the 
format or encoding (TeX, MathML, etc). The format is specified by the uri given 
as the literal's type, and the uri should resolve to a description of the 
format.

Btw, I'm not very happy about an extension defined data type being in 
ontology.owl, but I don't think it's a disaster either. I tried to come up with 
a better mechanism in I7599e7fa5391f9, but using that for math would mean a 
breaking change.


TASK DETAIL
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T67397

EMAIL PREFERENCES
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/

To: Physikerwelt, daniel
Cc: gerritbot, ArthurPSmith, TomT0m, Llyrian, WickieTheViking, Aklapper, 
MGChecker, Micru, Sannita, Ricordisamoa, Rits, Liuxinyu970226, Tpt, 
Physikerwelt, Wikidata-bugs, Bene, Tobias1984, Lydia_Pintscher, daniel, Izno, 
mobrovac, Prod, aude, fredw, Pkra, scfc, Mbch331, Ltrlg



_______________________________________________
Wikidata-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs

Reply via email to