Billinghurst added a comment.
@gymel What you are describing is related to a topic/subject, not so much a work. Each article would be articulated on the Q-item as "described by source" and links can be provided to each currently. For example for an author, you could call each "described by ..." by use of $1 to $9, etc. in a template to call back each value listed in the link. As I see your commentary it relates to a work about a subject related to another work about the same subject. I don't see that if I have an article on a person in the (English) Dictionary of National Biography that the DNB article has a direct relationship/interest in a Russian encyclopaedia about the same person, and vice versa. If that is not what you mean, then I am not getting the gist of your argument. TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T128173 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: Billinghurst Cc: Billinghurst, MF-Warburg, Liuxinyu970226, Purodha, Ankry, Candalua, Gymel, Aklapper, Micru, StudiesWorld, D3r1ck01, Izno, Wikidata-bugs, aude, jayvdb, AuFCL, Mbch331, Krenair _______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
