JanZerebecki added a comment.

  I know I'm repeating myself, but for some this is probably not a repeat: This 
is reimplementing part of what Mediawiki provides, but at the same time is not 
further along nor provides any advantage over what Mediawiki provides. 
Mediawiki its JS module loader correctly implements more than what this task is 
about. The code needed to display the WDQS GUI on a special page would be 
small. One thing isn't solved for Mediawiki: A step that runs npm to pull in JS 
components. I started https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T133388 (an RFC) for 
that. But the WDQS GUI repo doesn't implement that either.
  
  I'd suggest moving the WDQS GUI to a Mediawiki extension, as that is required 
for some things we want to do in the future anyway. @Jonas do you want to go 
that route?
  
  ---
  
  Yes, as pointed out, deploying WDQS requires more manual steps since the gui 
repo was created. I would have liked for it to get more automated instead. 
Please remember that this is a production service, other people need to be able 
to contribute and need to deploy security fixes. For my taste that would 
require being capable of continuous deployment.

TASK DETAIL
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T133026

EMAIL PREFERENCES
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/

To: Smalyshev, JanZerebecki
Cc: gerritbot, daniel, TerraCodes, Gehel, Lydia_Pintscher, JanZerebecki, Jonas, 
Aklapper, Avner, Lewizho99, Maathavan, debt, D3r1ck01, FloNight, Izno, jkroll, 
Smalyshev, Wikidata-bugs, Jdouglas, aude, Deskana, Manybubbles, Mbch331



_______________________________________________
Wikidata-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs

Reply via email to