RobLa-WMF added a comment.

On 2016-09-05, @daniel moved the description of this task to mw:Multi-Content_Revisions That page now has many subpages, described in Daniel's recent email to wikitech-l

This is tentatively slated to be discussed in our ArchCom IRC meeting in a couple of weeks (E273, scheduled for 2016-09-21).

There's a lot to sift through. Daniel: a while back, you posted this list of questions:

Open questions:

  • Do we need to record the (primary) slots in th edatabase, so we can enumerate them reliably? Alternatively, we could ask all relevant services for all possible slots to get an enumeration.
  • Can primary content be stored outside the blob-store model? Related: should the slot table really have blob URLs?
  • Multiple "events" per revisions may be useful: each "like", each "view", each "comment", etc. "sub-revisions"?
  • Versioning for content models (wikibase model 0.1, 0.2, 1.0, 2.0; parsoid html 1.0, 1.1, 1.2...)
  • Drop content formats?
  • Slot content: use Content interface? More basic RevisionData interface? Or allow specialized interfaces, such as ParserOutput objects?
  • Optional meta-data associated with slots (etag, etc?)? with revisions (rev-props)? with blobs (hash, size)?

Are those still the key questions? Which ones have been answered?


TASK DETAIL
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T107595

EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/

To: brion, RobLa-WMF
Cc: Mholloway, Scott_WUaS, Niharika, MGChecker, LikeLifer, Elitre, Glaisher, JJMC89, RobLa-WMF, Yurik, ArielGlenn, APerson, TomT0m, Krenair, intracer, Tgr, Tobi_WMDE_SW, Addshore, Lydia_Pintscher, cscott, PleaseStand, awight, Ricordisamoa, GWicke, MarkTraceur, waldyrious, Legoktm, Aklapper, Jdforrester-WMF, Ltrlg, brion, Spage, MZMcBride, daniel, D3r1ck01, Izno, Luke081515, Wikidata-bugs, aude, jayvdb, fbstj, Mbch331, Jay8g, bd808
_______________________________________________
Wikidata-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs

Reply via email to