| hoo added subscribers: aude, daniel, Lydia_Pintscher. hoo added a comment. |
Since 98bd2437ae38f395a8b47e6895793e88ca3ae6b4 we use larger transactions in EntityUsageTable (one for the whole set (up to 400(?)), not one per batch (up to 100 rows).
If this is indeed the cause for this, we presumably have to do what I suggested on the change "Should this cause problems with long lasting transactions, the atomic sections should be removed instead.".
TASK DETAIL
EMAIL PREFERENCES
To: hoo
Cc: Lydia_Pintscher, daniel, aude, hoo, Aklapper, jcrespo, Marostegui, Minhnv-2809, D3r1ck01, Izno, Luke081515, Wikidata-bugs, Mbch331, Jay8g, Krenair
Cc: Lydia_Pintscher, daniel, aude, hoo, Aklapper, jcrespo, Marostegui, Minhnv-2809, D3r1ck01, Izno, Luke081515, Wikidata-bugs, Mbch331, Jay8g, Krenair
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
